PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD HANEEF vs PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary (Universities and Boards) Sindh Secretariat, Karachi Recruitment — 2025 PLC(CS) 1654 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 PLC(CS) 1654 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PLC
Parties
MUHAMMAD HANEEF vs PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary (Universities and Boards) Sindh Secretariat, Karachi Recruitment
Subject matter
Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD HANEEF VS PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary (Universities and Boards) Sindh Secretariat, Karachi Recruitment---Candidate clearing the written test but failing to qualify for final appointment---Consideration for appointment, right of---Scope---Clearing written test alone does not confer vested right to appointment---The petitioner applied for the posts of Junior Clerk and Steno Typist in the Office of the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education and he secured 53/100 marks in the written tests and was called for interview, however, no appointment letter was issued---Held: Petitioner did clear the written component of the test but he did not qualify for final appointment for the post of junior clerk---Furthermore no appointment letters to any individuals were issued as of yet for the posts in question---Petitioner's contention that securing passing marks entitled him to appointment was misconceived---Constitutional petition being devoid of any merit was dismissed, in circumstances. Citation Name: 2025 PLC(CS) 1654 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case MUHAMMAD HANEEF VS PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary (Universities and Boards) Sindh Secretariat, Karachi art.199---Civil service---Recruitment---Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, invoking of---Direction for reconstitution of the Selection Committee and to compel the authorities to conduct skill/typing test, seeking of---Matters pertaining to policy implementation and administrative discretion---Interference of the High Court under Constitutional jurisdiction---Scope---Such matters pertain to policy implementation and administrative discretion which fall outside the purview of High Court's Constitutional jurisdiction and therefore cannot be entertained through the writ jurisdiction. Citation Name: 2025 PLC(CS) 1654 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case MUHAMMAD HANEEF VS PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary (Universities and Boards) Sindh Secretariat, Karachi Recruitment---Candidate included in merit list after securing passing marks---Effect---Consideration for appointment---Scope---Even qualified candidates do not possess a vested right to be appointment merely by virtue of securing passing marks---There is no obligation on the appointing authority to fill all advertised posts or to select from amongst candidates based solely on test performance---Moreover, mere inclusion in the merit list does not confer any vested right to appointment.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English