MUHAMMAD ASLAM vs FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY through Director General, Islamabad art

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

MUHAMMAD ASLAM VS FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY through Director General, Islamabad art.25---Civil service---Up-gradation of different posts---Discrimination---Policy decision of Executive---Interference by Court---Scope---Constitutional petition---Scope---Petitioners alleged that the BPS of aSI, HC and Constables in other federal departments had been up-graded from BPS-09, BPS-07 and BPS-05 to BPS-11, BPS-09 and BPS-07, respectively, however, aSI, HC and Constables Serving in FIa were still in BPS-9, BPS-07 and BPS-05, respectively, which was promoting a sense of despair and discrimination---Petition was filed to consider the petitioners for up-gradation to the posts of Constable from BPS-5 to 7, Head Constable from BPS-7 to 9 and aSI from BPS-9 to 11, respectively, by declaring the inaction on the part of respondents as illegal, unlawful and without lawful authority---Held, that up-gradation of a post is not a vested right, rather it stems from a policy decision intended to benefit a particular set of employees under the scheme embedded in the policy---Up-gradation cannot be mixed up with promotion---In the case of up-gradation, the employee continues to hold the same post without any change in his duties, but he is accorded a higher pay scale in order to mitigate the distress associated with stagnation due to a lack of progression or promotional avenues---Once the Government announces a policy, it is also responsible for enforcing such policy across the board to accord the benefit of the policy to all those who are eligible under it and may be benefited because of it---No doubt, the Court cannot interfere in the policymaking domain of the Government, but when a widespread and comprehensive policy is announced to benefit employees, it should be implemented bigheartedly and generously, without adding any ifs and buts or discrimination that could stifle the main objective of the policy---In the present cases, not only the department of the respondents fully supported the up-gradation, but also communicated with the concerned quarter in order to espouse the interest of their employees---Equal treatment with equal opportunity is a cornerstone for an egalitarian society, while acts of discrimination in the workplace seriously undermine a harmonious working environment and create unrest among employees discriminated who are deprived of perks and privileges---Up-gradation could not be construed as promotion, but could be granted through a policy---Petitioners had successfully established that they had been treated discriminately by the respondents in the matter of up-gradation of posts, which act of the respondents offended the mandate of art. 25 of the Constitution---Resultantly petition was allowed and the respondents were directed to up-grade/re-designate the posts of Constable, Head Constable and aSI from BPS-5 to BPS-7, from BPS-7 to BPS-9 and from BPS-9 to 11, respectively.

MUHAMMAD ASLAM vs FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY through Director General, Islamabad art — 2025 PLC(CS) 861 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2025 PLC