2025 PLC(CS) 891 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court

Case information

Citation: 2025 PLC(CS) 891 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: PLC
Subject matter: Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ALI MUHAMMAD VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan Civil Secretariat, Gilgit Government Employees' deceased quota---Appointment---Real brother of deceased---Entitlement---Admittedly, the petitioner was real brother of deceased and the children of deceased were minor, therefore, they were not eligible for appointment against the post of Sub Engineer (BS-11) while the widow of the deceased was not willing to be appointed against the said post, rather she had nominated the petitioner for appointment against the said post as he (petitioner) was the sole bread earner of the family---Moreover, the petitioner was looking after the children of the deceased, therefore, he was entitled for appointment against the post of Sub-Engineer (BS-11) [under the Prime Minister Family Assistant Package]---Furthermore, record transpired that the respondents, previously, on two instances, had appointed real brothers of deceased employees---Thus, act of the respondents against the present petitioner was discriminatory, unacceptable and misappropriate---Petitioner, being eligible and having relevant qualification/ degree, was entitled for appointment against the post of Sub Engineer (BS-11) under the PM Family Assistance Package admissible to the family members of Government employees who died during their services---Chief Court directed the respondents to appoint the petitioner against the post of Sub-Engineer (BS-11) under the Prime Minister Family Assistant Package---Writ petition was allowed.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PLC

2025 PLC(CS) 1593 SUPREME-COURTPROVINCE OF SINDH VS AMANULLAH 'Mutatis mutandis'---Connotation---Expression mutatis mutandis generally applies for making certain adjustmen…
2025 PLC(CS) 1663 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSHEHROZE RAHEEM MUGHAL VS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION R. 11---Identical cases, entertaining of---Scope ---Petitioner, while relying on R. 11 o…
2025 PLC(CS) 606 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRGHAZANFAR ALI VS VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR Principle---adequate alternate remedy----Under common law, remedy of…
2025 PLC(CS) 1663 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSHEHROZE RAHEEM MUGHAL VS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Conduct of the party invoking writ jurisdiction of High Court---Scope and effect ---Peti…
2025 PLC(CS) 1663 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSHEHROZE RAHEEM MUGHAL VS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION administration of justice---Points ascertained at time of admission of case---Subsequent…
2025 PLC(CS) 1663 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSHEHROZE RAHEEM MUGHAL VS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Doctrine of laches---Indolence of aggrieved party---Effect---Petitioner filed the writ p…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English