PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD SADIQ vs State Ss — 2025 PLD 31 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2025 PLD 31 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PLD
Parties
MUHAMMAD SADIQ vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 35; S. 397; Penal Code (XLV of 1860); Penal Code

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD SADIQ VS State Ss. 35, 397 & 544-a---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302(b), 324, 449, 337-a(iii) & 337-F(iii)---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, house trespass, shajjah-i-hashimah, ghayr-jaifah-mutalahimah---Constitutional petition---Diyat, payment of---accused filed petition for allowing him to pay the amount of diyat, fine and compensation in installments---Trial Court convicted the petitioner and awarded sentences with different amount of fine/compensation---Held, that fine has been prescribed as a distinct and independent punishment and therefore, in addition to the main/substantive punishment, the Court can award a punishment of fine, wherever it is provided under the Penal Code---Careful perusal of S. 35 read with S. 397 of Cr.P.C shows that in the matter of awarding sentences for different offences in a criminal trial, the Court has been given discretion to order that sentences so awarded for different offences in the same trial may commence one after the other in such manner, as the Court directs---at the same time, the Courts have been given discretion to pass an order that such punishments shall commence simultaneously and run concurrently---However, in the matter of punishment/s of fines, or in default to undergo simple imprisonment for certain terms, no such powers or discretion have been given to the Courts and in such case, the simple imprisonment in default of payment/s of fines shall run one after another or consecutively---Thus, the sentences of fine and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment for two and three months respectively, shall run consecutively---Since the petitioner was ready to pay the amount of diyat, fine and compensation, therefore the petition was disposed of accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English