UMAR AKBAR ALI GHUMMAN vs Mst — 2025 PLD 388 ISLAMABAD

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

UMAR AKBAR ALI GHUMMAN VS Mst. MARIA JAVED CHEEMA Ss. 7 & 17(a)---Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961), S.9---Suit for recovery of maintenance filed by wife---Wife's entitlement to maintenance discussed---Principles of Mohammedan law, deviation from---Not binding---Over time, the state has shown legitimate interest in regulating private relationships, as reflected in legislation addressing domestic violence, marriage, divorce, and maintenance---The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 and the Family Courts act, 1964, exemplify the shift toward codifying areas formerly governed by uncodified personal law---For instance, paragraphs 277 and 278 of D.F. Mulla's Principles of Mohammedan Law, list certain conditions that purportedly determine a wife's entitlement to maintenance, such as obedience, cohabitation, and fulfilling of marital obligations---The judicial reliance on such conditions has resulted in a subjective framework where maintenance claims are often decided based on a judge's discretion rather than consistent legal standards---Thus, there is no uniformity among scholarly consensus on whether such conditions must be met---Some jurists argue that compliance is necessary for a wife to claim maintenance, others maintain that maintenance is an unconditional right during the subsistence of marriage, and that a wife's refusal to live with her husband does not disentitle her to claim maintenance---Principles contained in Mohammedan Law could only be consulted as a reference book; they cannot be termed as statutory law having binding effect, upon which any presumption could be drawn against a person---It was neither a statute, nor a custom or usage, therefore, the opinion of author of the book was not binding---It is settled law by now that the courts can indeed deviate from the viewpoint taken in the Mohammedan Law, especially if it is contrary to the principles of equity, good conscience and justice.

UMAR AKBAR ALI GHUMMAN vs Mst — 2025 PLD 388 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2025 PLD