MUHAMMAD SAJID vs Mst — 2025 PLD 461 SUPREME-COURT

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

MUHAMMAD SAJID VS Mst. SHAMSA ASGHAR Ss. 2(a), 2(e) & 5---Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), S.5---Gifts and presents---Recovery---Bride and groom, proprietary status of---Suit for recovery of dowery and maintenance---Appellant/groom was aggrieved of judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below without distinguishing dowry articles and presents---Validity---All property given to bride as dowry, bridal gifts, or presents vests absolutely in her---Use of the phrase "shall vest absolutely" confers exclusive and unqualified proprietary rights upon bride, thereby barring any adverse claim by husband or his relatives---Subsequent part "and her interest in property however derived shall hereafter not be restrictive, conditional or limited" acts as a safeguard to protect bride's proprietary autonomy from customary or familial encumbrances---Such absolute vesting of rights in the bride remains unaffected by any subsequent separation or divorce, thereby reinforcing her enduring and independent entitlement to such property---Legislative intent underpinning section 5 of Dowry and Bridal Gifts (Restriction) Act, 1976 is to secure independent proprietary status of bride and to shield her from dispossession, particularly in the event of marital breakdown--- Purposive interpretation of provision of section 5 of Dowry and Bridal Gifts (Restriction) Act, 1976 necessarily confines the scope of recoverable property to that which is demonstrably intended for the bride---Accordingly, items gifted to the groom or his relatives, unless clearly shown to be intended for the bridge's use or held in trust for her benefit, fall outside the protective ambit of Dowry and Bridal Gifts (Restriction) Act, 1976---Consequently, presents given to groom's family cannot be claimed by bride under Dowry and Bridal Gifts (Restriction) Act, 1976 unless it is clearly established that those were intended solely for her use or benefit---List provided by respondent/ bride showed that certain items, given to the family of appellant/groom, fell outside the scope of dowry and bridal gifts and were passed as "presents", as defined under Dowry and Bridal Gifts (Restriction) Act, 1976---Such items could not be decreed in favour of respondent/bride---Supreme Court modified the judgment passed by High Court to exclude such items, while the suit decreed in favour of respondent/bride to the extent of remaining items was maintained---Appeal was allowed.

MUHAMMAD SAJID vs Mst — 2025 PLD 461 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2025 PLD