ALTAF HUSSAIN vs State Qui sentit commodum, debet et sentire onus — 2025 PLD 478 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

ALTAF HUSSAIN VS State Qui sentit commodum, debet et sentire onus---Meaning---He who derives a benefit ought also to bear a burden.

2025 PLD 18 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESyed SHOUZAB IMRAN KAZMI VS Syeda IFFAT BUKHARI S. 7 [as amended by Muslim Family Laws (Second Amendment) Act (XXIX of 2021)]---Fiqah-e-Jafr…
2025 PLD 516 SUPREME-COURTJUSTICE MOHSIN AKHTAR KAYANI, JUDGE VS The PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN, PAK SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD art. 200---Transfer of High Court judges from o…
2025 PLD 262 SUPREME-COURTDr. FARYAL MAQSOOD VS KHURRAM SHEHZAD DURRANI S. 2(iia)---Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961), S. 6---Grounds for decree for dissolu…
2025 PLD 262 SUPREME-COURTDr. FARYAL MAQSOOD VS KHURRAM SHEHZAD DURRANI S. 2---Grounds for decree for dissolution of marriage---Cruelty by husband---Cruelty may be me…
2025 PLD 262 SUPREME-COURTDr. FARYAL MAQSOOD VS KHURRAM SHEHZAD DURRANI It is a settled principle of interpreting a contract that a court cannot imply something that…
2025 PLD 177 ISLAMABADARSHAD SHARIF, INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST/ANCHOR ARY COMMUNICATIONS (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Presid…