PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

B.R.R. GUARDIAN MODARABA vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice S — 2025 PLD 59 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 PLD 59 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PLD
Parties
B.R.R. GUARDIAN MODARABA vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 20; Pakistan Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

B.R.R. GUARDIAN MODARABA VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice S. 20(4)(o)---Modarba Companies and Modarba Rules, 1981, R. 8(4)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Inquiry, initiation of---Issuance of show cause notice---Petitioners were aggrieved of show cause notice issued by SECP in order to safeguard interests of Modarba Certificate holders---Validity---Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, in terms of S. 20(4)(o) of Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act, 1997 is empowered to perform such functions and exercise such powers of the Authority, including any powers of Federal Government delegated to the Authority and under any other law for the time being in force under which any function or power has been conferred on the Authority including, but not limited to, the functions and powers set out in Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act, 1997---SECP after hearing petitioners and/or their representatives passed order in question---Payments to different individuals on different heads were made without codal formalities and/or providing legitimacy of such payments---There were some incidents of fire which resulted in loss to company in view of absence of insurance coverage/Takafal---Huge payments needed to be scrutinized, and if the Regulator would keep a blind eye on it, then entire scheme set out in relevant laws to maintain a system of check and balance on companies would become redundant---High Court declined to exercise jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution as the petitioners failed to point out the fundamental right which had been infringed, as High Court was not sitting in appeal over order in question---Petitioners raised controversies factual in nature and the same were not warranted while exercising jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution---It was primary duty of regulatory authorities to safeguard interests of certificate holders and order in question was an attempt to achieve such goal---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English