PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (FEMALE), CHARSADDA vs SONIA BEGUM art — 2025 PLD 720 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2025 PLD 720 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2025
Reporter
PLD
Parties
DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (FEMALE), CHARSADDA vs SONIA BEGUM art
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 114---R; XXVI---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (FEMALE), CHARSADDA VS SONIA BEGUM art. 188---Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O.XXVI---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 114---Review jurisdiction---Scope---Every judgement rendered by Court of law is presumed to be a solemn and conclusive determination of all points arising out of the lis---Irregularities if any which have no significant effect or impact on outcome would not be sufficient to warrant review---If incongruity or ambiguity is of such a nature as to transmute the course of action from being one in aid of justice to a process of injustice then a review decision may be instituted for redressal to demonstrate error if it is found floating conspicuously on the surface of the record---Mere desire for rehearing of the matter cannot constitute sufficient ground for the grant of review which by its very nature cannot be equated with the right or remedy of appeal---Sanctity and finality of judicial determinations must not be compromised by mere persistence of litigants or mechanical issuance of advocate certificates---Review jurisdiction is not a fall back for unsuccessful litigants to reopen a lis but a narrowly confined judicial tool intended to correct palpable and consequential mistakes.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English