PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

WESTERN FREIGHT SHIPPING (PVT.) LTD. vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division S — 2025 PTD 1012 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 PTD 1012 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PTD
Parties
WESTERN FREIGHT SHIPPING (PVT.) LTD. vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division S
Subject matter
Constitutional
Provisions referred to
S. 3

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

WESTERN FREIGHT SHIPPING (PVT.) LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division S.3aa, Chapters XII & XIII---Customs Rules, 2001, Rr. 328, 476, 598 & 638---Tracking and Monitoring of Cargo Rules, 2023, R. 1124---Constitution of Pakistan, art.199---afghan Transit Trade---Tracking and monitoring---Discretion, exercise of---Clean hands---Petitioners were licensed custom-bonded carriers / transport operators, who were aggrieved of decision passed by Licensing Committee notifying respondent company for such transportation---Validity---authorities were required to ensure that transit cargo should reach the destination without any pilferage and for that they were required / authorized to track monitoring of such cargo under Tracking and Monitoring of Cargo Rules, 2023---Petitioners did not challenge provisions of Tracking and Monitoring of Cargo Rules, 2023---Decision taken by the Committee pursuant to R. 1124 of Tracking and Monitoring of Cargo Rules, 2023 was justified and fell within their domain and jurisdiction---It was a matter of exercising discretion to ensure proper transit of cargo in question---High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction declined to upset exercise of such discretion, which otherwise appeared to be lawful and fully justified---Most of the petitioners had already participated in new procedure, therefore, it was not appropriate for them to approach High Court seeking exercise of discretion in their favor---One, who approaches High Court for exercise of any discretion under art. 199 of the Constitution, must come with clean hands and be fair with the Court---High Court declined to interfere in the matter as the conduct of petitioners was not in consonance with principles of law and no case for indulgence was made out---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English