PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

NISHAT CHUNIAN LTD. vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE Preamble — 2025 PTD 1448 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 PTD 1448 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN
Year
2025
Reporter
PTD
Parties
NISHAT CHUNIAN LTD. vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE Preamble
Subject matter
Tax & Customs
Provisions referred to
S. 60A---W; Preamble---Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001); Workers Welfare Fund Ordinance; Finance Act; WWF Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

NISHAT CHUNIAN LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE Preamble---Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), S. 60A---Workers' Welfare Fund, contribution to---Scope and effect---Amendments made to the Workers Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971 through Finance Act, 2006 and Finance Act, 2008---Department filed appeal as the Commissioner Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner-Appeals') directed that Workers' Welfare Fund (WWF) be charged on the income determined after appeal effect according to Workers Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971) ('the WWF Ordinance') prior to amendments made through Finance Act, 2006 and 2008---Plea of the department being that the amendments in WWF Ordinance were not finally declared ultra vires and was still part of the statute---Validity---The contributions made to the WWF are not in the nature of tax; hence, the amendment made through Finance Act, 2006 and 2008 are unconstitutional---Since the amendments made in the WWF fund through Finance Act, 2006 and 2008 had been declared unconstitutional by the apex courts therefore the ground of the department does not hold water---The Commissioner-Appeals rightly directed to charge WWF as existed prior to amendments made through Finance Act, 2006 and 2008---No case of interference was made out by the Department---Appeal, filed by the Department, was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English