PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Ch. BASHARAT ALI HANJRA vs CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ('CDA') ISLAMABAD S — 2025 PTD 1617 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2025 PTD 1617 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PTD
Parties
Ch. BASHARAT ALI HANJRA vs CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ('CDA') ISLAMABAD S
Subject matter
Constitutional
Provisions referred to
S. 132; S. 15-A; Capital Development Authority Ordinance (XXIII of 1960); Municipal Administration Ordinance (X of 1960); Islamabad Capital Territory Local Government Act; Capital Development Authority Ordinance; Municipal Administration Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Ch. BASHARAT ALI HANJRA VS CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ('CDA') ISLAMABAD S. 132 (2)----Capital Development Authority Ordinance (XXIII of 1960), Ss.15-A & 132(2)---Municipal Administration Ordinance (X of 1960), Ss. 33, 34 & Third Schedule---Notification SRO No. 576 (I) / 2015, dated 09-06-2015---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Municipal taxes, levy of---Right of Way and Direct Access charges---Petitioners were aggrieved of charging Right of Way and Direct Access charges by Capital Development Authority---Validity---After promulgation of Islamabad Capital Territory Local Government Act, 2015, municipal functions, including taxation, were transferred to elected local governments established under that law---Provision of S. 15-A of Capital Development Authority Ordinance, 1960 was explicitly omitted and delegation of municipal powers, including taxation, ceased to exist---Capital Development Authority's continued imposition of "right to way tax" via SRO No. 576 (I) / 2015, dated 09-06-2015 lacked statutory backing---Such tax was neither enumerated under Third Schedule of Municipal Administration Ordinance, 1960 (when CDA temporarily functioned as a municipal authority) nor was it protected under S. 132(2) of Islamabad Capital Territory Local Government Act, 2015, which saved prior rules or actions taken lawfully under repealed statutes---Tax in question was never validly levied under Capital Development Authority Ordinance, 1960 and was not protected under any savings clause---Capital Development Authority was not an elected body, and any exercise of taxation authority by it must strictly adhere to both the substantive and procedural requirements set out in Ss. 33 & 34 of Municipal Administration Ordinance, 1960 the requirements of which were not followed by Capital Development Authority---Entire administrative, regulatory and municipal framework of Islamabad Capital Territory was governed under Islamabad Capital Territory Local Government Act, 2015, which was a special legislation enacted to regulate local governance through elected representatives---High Court struck-down notification SRO No.576 (I)/2015 dated 09-06-2015 as the same was illegal, ultra vires, without lawful authority or jurisdiction---High Court directed that any amount collected from any person or entity under notification SRO No.576 (I)/2015 dated 09-06-2015 was liable to be refunded---High Court declared that all actions taken pursuant thereto were void and without legal effect---High Court directed Federal Government to initiate and conclude process for dissolution of Capital Development Authority and to transfer all powers, assets, and functions to Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad---Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly. Your Search returned total 35531 records from 8450 - 8500

Other judgments reported in 2025 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English