PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SHABEER ALI vs State Ss — 2025 SCMR 802 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2025 SCMR 802 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2025
Reporter
SCMR
Parties
SHABEER ALI vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SHABEER ALI VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 337-F(i), 337-F(ii) & 452---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 10A---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 237, 342 & 537---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, ghayr-jaifah damiyah, ghayr-jaifah badi'ah and house-trespass---Re-appraisal of evidence---Right to a fair trial---Defective charge---Fact not confronted to accused---Grave procedural irregularity---Effect---Sentence reduced---Accused was convicted by Trial Court for committing three murders and was sentenced to death on three counts---Validity---Omission to frame a charge for a distinct offence is a substantial illegality, rendering the trial a nullity--- Such omission is not a mere irregularity, that can be cured under section 537, Cr.P.C. rather, is a defect, that strikes at the root of proceedings, necessitating intervention to prevent miscarriage of justice---Procedural safeguard under section 342, Cr.P.C. ensures that accused is confronted with all incriminating evidence to afford him opportunity to explain circumstances against him---Omission to "frame a charge", coupled with failure to put a material accusation to accused under section 342, Cr.P.C., was a grave procedural irregularity that could not be remedied under section 537, Cr.P.C., as it resulted in a fundamental breach of the right to a fair trial---In such mitigating circumstances imposition of maximum penalty was not warranted---Absence of a proven motive, coupled with circumstances indicating absence of premeditation, necessitated reconsideration of quantum of punishment---Accused was entitled to a lesser sentence, as Courts are obligated to ensure that punishment awarded is proportionate to facts and circumstances of case---Supreme Court maintained conviction of accused but converted sentence of death into imprisonment for life---Appeal was allowed.

Other judgments reported in 2025 SCMR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English