PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Anees Ur Rehman vs State Ss — 2025 YLR 1094 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2025 YLR 1094 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Anees Ur Rehman vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 103

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Anees Ur Rehman VS State Ss. 302(b) & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Recovery of 'dupatta' and 'hammer' at the instance of accused---Inconsequential---Accused was charged that he along with his co-accused committed murder of his wife/daughter of the complainant---Record showed that a dupatta and hammer were recovered at the instance of appellant---However, such recoveries were inconsequential for the reasons that the same were ordinary things, easily available in the market---Moreover, the prosecution had failed to associate any independent witness of the locality during recovery proceedings and, thus, the mandatory provisions of S. 103, Cr.P.C., had flagrantly been violated in that regard---Circumstances established that the prosecution could not prove its case against the appellant beyond any shadow of doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English