PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Najeeb ullah vs State S — 2025 YLR 1170 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 YLR 1170 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Najeeb ullah vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 9

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Najeeb ullah VS State S. 9(1)3(e)---Possession of narcotic substances---Appreciation of evidence---Contradictions in the statements of witnesses---Scope---Prosecution case was that 10-kilograms charas was recovered from the vehicle of appellants---Complainant neither in his murasila nor in his statement before the Court stated that after the recovery to whom he had handed over the recovered contraband---Complainant did not state that when did Investigating Officer come at the place of occurrence---Complainant did not state that how and in what manner the narcotics were recovered from the switchboard nor did he mention that how the contraband was weighed---Complainant did not testify and reveal regarding shape and kind of narcotics---Statement of the complainant was absolutely silent regarding extracting of samples---Testimony of recovery witness was not in line with the deposition of complainant---Recovery witness testified that ten packets of charas were recovered from secret cavities of AC fitted in the switchboard, but complainant did not mention so---Said witness stated that the colour of the recovered car was blue, whereas complainant in his murasila and FIR had mentioned the colour of said car as golden---Statements of both the witnesses had been found to be contradictory, creating doubt in the recovery---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English