Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1424 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mumtaz Ali vs State Ss — 2025 YLR 1424 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2025 YLR 1424 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: YLR
Parties: Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1424 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mumtaz Ali vs State Ss
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 7---Q

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1424 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mumtaz Ali VS State Ss. 324, 392, 397, 353 & 34---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), art. 22---attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, robbery, robbery or dacoity with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, using the criminal force or assault on public servant while he was performing his duty, common intention, act of terrorism---appreciation of evidence---Test identification parade---accused were charged for snatching motorcycle from the complainant, meanwhile four Police Officials arrived there on motorcycles, who signaled the accused to stop, but they opened fire on them with intention to kill them and deter them from discharging their duty causing firearm injury to a Police Constable; in retaliation one accused received bullet injuries and he fell down and was apprehended by the police---appellant was not apprehended on the spot---as per prosecution case, appellant succeeded to make his escape good from the crime scene, however, later on he was arrested in some other criminal case and, thereafter the complainant identified the appellant in the identification test---Complainant, while reiterating the contents of his FIR., had stated that, on 26.12.2022, Investigating Officer called him for identification test and he identified the appellant during identification test and assigned him clear role for commission of the offence---Complainant had identified the appellant, present in Court at the time of recording his evidence, as the same accused---Even in cross-examination, the defence had failed to shatter the evidence of complainant on the main incident, mode and manner of identification test in which he identified the appellant---appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

2025 YLR 1029 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANAbdul Malik VS State S. 497---Bail order---Observations of Court---Scope---Observations made in a bail order are tentative in nature and sam…
2025 YLR 1778 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSarwat Bibi VS Muhammad Idrees Kiani Double presumption of innocence---Scope---after acquittal, an accused carries double presumption of inn…
2025 YLR 451 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREEjaz Ahmed VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If a single circumstance creates a reasonable doubt in the mind of a prudent person, then…
2025 YLR 487 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHCitation Name: 2025 YLR 487 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Nadir Hussain VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---Single doubt in…
2025 YLR 443 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHCitation Name: 2025 YLR 443 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Qutubuddin Jakhrani VS State Minor contradictions---Scope---Where in…
2025 YLR 2329 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMrs. Rehana Khatoon VS M/s Delsol the School S.15---Eviction petition---Maintain-ability---Landlord being represented through attorney---Eff…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English