Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1584 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Muhammad Juman vs State Ss

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1584 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Muhammad Juman VS State Ss. 302(b), 324 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account supported by medical evidence---Accused were charged for committing murder of two brothers of complainant by inflicting fatal injuries---Ocular account of the incident had been furnished by three witnesses---Defence could not point out to any material contradiction in evidence of those three eye-witnesses---All three witnesses had supported each other that incident took place due to playing of tape recorder at high pitch by the appellants which was objected by deceased and when he tried to stop the appellants, they in response attacked him as well as other deceased, who came to rescue him---Apart from revealing the main story, as it played out before their eyes, all the witnesses had confirmed that the injured were taken to Police Station first in a Datsun and after getting a letter for treatment from there, they were admitted in hospital for treatment---However, next day, one brother of complainant died in the Hospital, whereas injured who was meanwhile referred to other Hospital for better treatment died there on 28.03.2001---Said witnesses who were also mashirs had confirmed that on 26.03.2001 appellants were arrested by the police under a relevant memo. signed by them---Not only, on the main features of the case, said witnesses had espoused each other but on the allying facts also they had supported each other---Evidence of said witnesses was further strengthened by medical evidence---Medical Officer in his evidence had confirmed that on 23.03.2001, injured were referred to him for treatment---Injuries described by the said Medical Officer proved fatal and subsequently the injured died in the hospital---In order to prove unnatural death of other deceased in other hospital, prosecution had examined Medical Officer, who had confirmed that on 23.03.2001 in the night time injured was transferred to hospital for treatment and remained under his treatment---Although injured was talking but due to his injuries he was restless and irritable---Later on, he developed sepses and A.R.D.S. and remained on ventilator and expired on 28.03.2001---From evidence of all the Medical Officers, it had been established that the deceased died out of injuries inflicted on them on the day of incident by the appellants---Nothing in that regard had been pointed out in defence to show that appellants died out of some other cause than articulated by the prosecution in the case---No contradiction was found in medical and oral account, nor any could be read in the disclosure of the Medical Officers---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1584 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Muhammad Juman vs State Ss — 2025 YLR 1584 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR