PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1601 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Bashir alias Bashoo vs State Ss — 2025 YLR 1601 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 YLR 1601 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1601 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Bashir alias Bashoo vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1601 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Bashir alias Bashoo VS State Ss. 397, 457, 337-a(i), 148 & 149---Robbery, hurt, shajjah-i-khafifah, rioting armed with deadly weapon, unlawful assembly---appreciation of evidence---Presence of the witnesses at the spot and seeing the occurrence doubtful---appellants were charged for committing robbery in the house of complainant, causing hurt to him and taking away gold ornaments, cash and other valuables---Complainant had not produced any receipt in respect of the gold ornaments allegedly robbed and of the mobile phones nor did he give detail of the cash amount that where from he obtained such amount and where it was available in the house at the time of robbery---Though the complainant in his evidence deposed that he produced the receipts before the Investigating Officer but the same were not exhibited by him or the Investigating Officer in evidence nor the same were available in the file---Even the handkerchiefs used by the accused persons to tie the hands of the complainant and his witnesses were not produced by the complainant nor were such recovered by the Investigating Officer---Complainant in the FIR or at the time of recording his evidence did not depose a single word that the accused persons used stairs while entering in the house or at the time of their escape from the house nor the same had been deposed by the eye-witness---However, other witness had deposed that all the accused persons entered in their house by putting stairs at the wall of their house---During cross-examination he stated that the stairs was lying outside of their house but such stairs was not shown by the Investigating Officer---Said witnesses brought the said stairs in their house which too reflected that none of the witnesses saw the incident and after 21 days they had implicated the present appellants in the case---Circumstances established that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in the acquittal of accused---appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English