PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Abdul Baqi vs State Ss — 2025 YLR 1657 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 YLR 1657 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Abdul Baqi vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 516-; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Abdul Baqi VS State Ss. 561-a & 22-a---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 403 & 409---Constitution of Pakistan, art. 199---Criminal misconduct---Dishonest misappropriation of property---Criminal breach of trust by public servant---Power of Ex-Officio Justice of Peace---Quashing of order---Scope---Petitioner had recovered a car during the investigation of a case---Subsequently, the owner of the vehicle in question filed an application under S. 516-a, Cr.P.C before the Trial Court for release of vehicle; initially the same was withdrawn and subsequently fresh application was filed, which was allowed, whereby the Trial Court, while utilizing the powers and jurisdiction as an Ex-Officio Justice of Peace directed the Commissioner and the Deputy Commissioner concerned to initiate a criminal case by means of lodging FIR against the petitioner/Investigation Officer of the case under Ss.403 and 409, P.P.C---Validity---In the case in hand, no complaint had been filed against the petitioner rather an application under Section 561-a, Cr.P.C. for release of vehicle was filed before the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, wherein neither any complaint was filed or pending against the petitioner nor any such relief was sought against the petitioner for registering FIR against him---Impugned order had been passed by the Trial Court in the capacity of Ex-Officio Justice of Peace without holding an enquiry and without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, giving directions to the higher hierarchy of the petitioner's department for lodging of FIR, which was contrary to the scheme of law---Besides, the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace was not a Judicial Magistrate, who could take cognizance upon his own knowledge or information communicated to him---However, any order passed by a Court in the capacity of Ex-Officio Justice of Peace should be respected as the same was passed by him; while performing a quasi-judicial function, but only in a case, when a complaint was made before him in writing for excess committed by a levies/police official/officer---Without any application or complaint before Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, he could not pass an order against any levies/police officer---In such a situation, it would be appropriate to provide the said levies officer an opportunity to clarify his position by holding an inquiry by himself or through some other authority---any suggestion or direction given by the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace is required to be respected similar to a judicial order and should be followed in letter and spirit, otherwise the person disobeying the same may expose himself for appropriate action as per law---Petition was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English