PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Aurangzeb vs State Ss — 2025 YLR 1702 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2025 YLR 1702 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Aurangzeb vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 15---Q

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Aurangzeb VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 337-a(iii), 337-F(iii), 337-F(iv), 337-F(v), 148 & 149---Khyber Pakhtunkhwa arms act (XXIII of 2013), S. 15---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, shajjah-i-hashimah, ghayr-jaifah-mutalahimah, ghayr-jaifah-mudihah, ghayr-jaifah-hashimah, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly, possession of illicit weapon---appreciation of evidence---Medical evidence in conflict with the ocular account---accused were charged for committing murder of two persons of the complainant party and also causing firearm injuries to three persons---Record showed that the medical evidence was in conflict with the ocular account, as 11 accused were charged in the tragic incident, but the number of injuries did commensurate with the number of accused so the conflict between the two had created dents in the case of the prosecution---Medical evidence was confirmatory in nature, but once the witnesses failed to convince, then the conflict between the two could be considered to the benefit of the accused, and the present case was no exception---Circumstances established that the prosecution failed to bring home guilt against the appellants---appeal against conviction was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English