Citation Name: 2025 YLR 187 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mansoor Mujahid vs State Ss

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 187 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mansoor Mujahid VS State Ss. 302(b), 297 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, trespassing on burial places, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Delay of two days in lodging the FIR---Accused were charged that they in furtherance of their common intention committed murder of the deceased by causing fire shot and dagger injuries and then poured acid on his dead body and then threw it in an open space---Admittedly, there was no eye-witness to the incident---Evidence of "SA" who happened to be the driver of the deceased with no driving license was to the extent that on 20.06.2013 he took the deceased and absconding accused Mst. "MZ" in car to the house/ apartment of appellant wherefrom he did not return---On inquiry, said witness was told by the appellants and the absconding accused Mst. "MZ" that the deceased had already gone; he intimated such fact to Mst. "N", then went to the house of deceased with his car and related such fact to wife of the deceased---On 21.06.2013, it was intimated to said witness by wife of deceased that she had received a message from absconding accused Mst. "MZ" that appellant had murdered the deceased---On such intimation, said witness and relatives of the deceased went to the Police Station and reported the incident there, which was done on 21.06.2013, with a delay of about one day of the actual missing of the deceased---Technically it was a First Information Report of the incident---Death of the deceased being unnatural was confirmed by Medical Officer with the narration that the time between the death of deceased and postmortem was about 36 to 48 hours---Investigating Officer further stated that he then recorded S.154, Cr.P.C statement of complainant; it was recorded on 22.06.2013 with a further delay of one day---Same was later on incorporated into FIR---Indeed, it was the Second Information Report of the same incident---Circumstances established that the prosecution had not been able to prove its case against the appellants beyond a shadow of a reasonable doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 187 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mansoor Mujahid vs State Ss — 2025 YLR 187 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR