Citation Name: 2025 YLR 187 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mansoor Mujahid vs State Ss — 2025 YLR 187 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2025 YLR 187 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: YLR
Parties: Citation Name: 2025 YLR 187 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mansoor Mujahid vs State Ss
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 164---Q; Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 187 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mansoor Mujahid VS State Ss. 302(b), 297 & 34---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 164---Qatl-i-amd, trespassing on burial places, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Judicial confession of accused---Scope---Accused were charged that they in furtherance of their common intention committing murder of the deceased by causing fire shot and dagger injuries and then poured acid on his dead body and then threw it in an open space---Record showed that the judicial confession of appellant Mst. "AZ" was recorded whereby she stated that it was Mst. "MZ" who had murdered the deceased by causing him fire shot injuries---Investigating Officer recovered a diary on the pointation of appellant Mst. "AZ"; it was written therein by her that she had been subjected to rape by the deceased and it was read by the appellant---Such fact was alleged to be a motive for the incident---Said diary had never been produced in evidence before the Court under the deception that it had been burnt on account of a fire in Malkhana of District Court---No entry was produced by any of the Investigating Officers which could have suggested that such a diary was kept by them in Malkhana---In such a situation, none of the appellants could be connected with such a diary---Circumstances established that the prosecution had not been able to prove its case against the appellants beyond a shadow of a reasonable doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

2025 YLR 1029 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANAbdul Malik VS State S. 497---Bail order---Observations of Court---Scope---Observations made in a bail order are tentative in nature and sam…
2025 YLR 1778 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSarwat Bibi VS Muhammad Idrees Kiani Double presumption of innocence---Scope---after acquittal, an accused carries double presumption of inn…
2025 YLR 451 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREEjaz Ahmed VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If a single circumstance creates a reasonable doubt in the mind of a prudent person, then…
2025 YLR 487 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHCitation Name: 2025 YLR 487 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Nadir Hussain VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---Single doubt in…
2025 YLR 443 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHCitation Name: 2025 YLR 443 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Qutubuddin Jakhrani VS State Minor contradictions---Scope---Where in…
2025 YLR 2329 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMrs. Rehana Khatoon VS M/s Delsol the School S.15---Eviction petition---Maintain-ability---Landlord being represented through attorney---Eff…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English