Citation Name: 2025 YLR 246 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Syed Qurban Ali Shah vs State S — 2025 YLR 246 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2025 YLR 246 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: YLR
Parties: Citation Name: 2025 YLR 246 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Syed Qurban Ali Shah vs State S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 497; S. 25---A; Penal Code (XLV of 1860); Sindh Arms Act (V of 2013)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 246 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Syed Qurban Ali Shah VS State S.497(2)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324, 506(2), 337-A(i), 337-F(i) & 34---Sindh Arms Act (V of 2013), S.25---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, criminal intimidation, shajjah-i-khafifah, damiyah, common intention, possession of illicit arms---Bail, grant of---Further inquiry---At bail stage it could not be concluded definitely that whether the victim sustained two or three injuries, thus, discrepancy between the eye-witnesses testimony and the medical evidence, as per the preliminary assessment, warranted caution regarding the credibility of the prosecution's allegations---There were contradictory statements in the FIR and the medico legal report as to time and date of occurrence and medical examination---Eye-witness of the injuries during investigation did not corroborate the prosecution version, rather he stated that he was not present at the time of occurrence---Recovery of weapon was effected after arrest, however, police failed to associate mashirs of recovery from the local community, rather associated mashirs were closely associated with the complainant, who were not residents of the locality where the alleged recovery was made---Accused were in judicial custody since the day of their arrest---Challan had already been submitted to the court against the accused, indicating that they were not required for further investigation---Accused had no criminal history of being habitual offenders or previous convicts---Case against the accused persons called for further enquiry falling within the ambit of S.497(2), Cr.P.C.---Accused were granted bail, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

2025 YLR 1029 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANAbdul Malik VS State S. 497---Bail order---Observations of Court---Scope---Observations made in a bail order are tentative in nature and sam…
2025 YLR 1778 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSarwat Bibi VS Muhammad Idrees Kiani Double presumption of innocence---Scope---after acquittal, an accused carries double presumption of inn…
2025 YLR 451 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREEjaz Ahmed VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If a single circumstance creates a reasonable doubt in the mind of a prudent person, then…
2025 YLR 487 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHCitation Name: 2025 YLR 487 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Nadir Hussain VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---Single doubt in…
2025 YLR 443 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHCitation Name: 2025 YLR 443 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Qutubuddin Jakhrani VS State Minor contradictions---Scope---Where in…
2025 YLR 2329 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMrs. Rehana Khatoon VS M/s Delsol the School S.15---Eviction petition---Maintain-ability---Landlord being represented through attorney---Eff…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English