Citation Name: 2025 YLR 387 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Sajjad Hussain Bhatti vs Mst — 2025 YLR 387 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2025 YLR 387 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: YLR
Parties: Citation Name: 2025 YLR 387 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Sajjad Hussain Bhatti vs Mst
Subject matter: Civil

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 387 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Sajjad Hussain Bhatti VS Mst. Quratulain Zehra Memon Ss. 5, Sched. & 14---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Suit for dissolution of marriage and recovery of dowry articles---Denial of the petitioner qua receipt of dowry articles---Concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Family Court and Appellate Court qua dowry articles---Interference by the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction---Scope---There were concurrent findings of facts against the petitioner given by both the forums below---Arguments of petitioner were based on hypothesis as no tenable evidence had been adduced by him, which even did not appeal to common sense because the dowry articles are traditionally shifted to the house of bridegroom before the actual ceremony of marriage---Both the courts below had discussed the entire evidence led by the parties in proper context and had come to a conclusion thereby dismissing the case of the petitioner that he did not have any dowry articles of the plaintiff/respondent in his possession---In constitutional jurisdiction, reappraisal of evidence just because another view is possible, is not permissible---When it had not been indicated that there was any apparent illegality in appreciating the evidence by both the courts below, the High Court would not rush to substitute its view for the findings recorded by the courts below, unless it is shown from the record that some ostensible illegality has been committed---Petitioner had failed to point out any illegality in the findings of both the courts below, thus, High Court did not find any merit in the constitutional petition, which was dismissed along with pending applications, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

2025 YLR 1029 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANAbdul Malik VS State S. 497---Bail order---Observations of Court---Scope---Observations made in a bail order are tentative in nature and sam…
2025 YLR 1778 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSarwat Bibi VS Muhammad Idrees Kiani Double presumption of innocence---Scope---after acquittal, an accused carries double presumption of inn…
2025 YLR 451 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREEjaz Ahmed VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If a single circumstance creates a reasonable doubt in the mind of a prudent person, then…
2025 YLR 487 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHCitation Name: 2025 YLR 487 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Nadir Hussain VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---Single doubt in…
2025 YLR 443 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHCitation Name: 2025 YLR 443 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Qutubuddin Jakhrani VS State Minor contradictions---Scope---Where in…
2025 YLR 2329 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMrs. Rehana Khatoon VS M/s Delsol the School S.15---Eviction petition---Maintain-ability---Landlord being represented through attorney---Eff…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English