PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Ejaz Ahmed vs State Ss — 2025 YLR 451 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2025 YLR 451 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Ejaz Ahmed vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Ejaz Ahmed VS State Ss. 302(b), 148 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Delay in conducting post mortem on the dead bodies of the deceased---Accused were charged for committing murder of two persons of the complainant party by firing---Record showed that the postmortem examinations of the dead bodies of the deceased were conducted with much delay---According to the statement of Medical Officer, the post mortem examination of the dead body of the deceased was conducted by him on 20.03.2015 at 09.45 p.m, whereas the post mortem examination of the dead body of the other deceased was conducted by him on 20.03.2015 at 08.30 p.m.---Furthermore, according to the Post Mortem Examination Reports as well as the statement of Medical Officer, the police papers were received at 08.00 p.m. on 20.03.2015 and thereafter the post mortem examinations of the dead bodies of the deceased were conducted---Perusal of the Post Mortem Examination Reports as well as the statement of Medical Officer clearly established the fact that the post mortem examinations of the dead bodies of the deceased were delayed and the delay was due to the late submission of police papers---No explanation was offered to justify the said delay in conducting the post mortem examinations---Said fact clearly established that the witnesses claiming to have seen the occurrence were not present at the time of occurrence and the delay in the post mortem examinations was used to procure their attendance and formulate a false narrative after consultation---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English