PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

BASHIR AHMED vs State S — 2025 YLR 777 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 YLR 777 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
YLR
Parties
BASHIR AHMED vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 9

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

BASHIR AHMED VS State S. 9(c)---Possession of narcotic substances---Appreciation of evidence---Contradictions in the statements of witnesses---Six packets of crystal, four packets of opium, twenty two packets of sheesha and four packet of heroine were recovered from the vehicle driven by the appellant---Complainant reiterated what he had reported in his murasila, but in his statement before the Court he did not state that after the recovery to whom he had handed over six (6) packets of crystal, four (4) packets of powder (heroin), four (4) packets of opium and twenty two (22) packets of sheesha---Recovery witness deposed that on 05.03.2023, he apprehended the appellant, while driving a pickup truck and recovered the said narcotics concealed beneath the rear seat of the said pickup, which were secured through recovery memo---Recovery witness produced parcels of samples and narcotics, including a pickup truck---During cross-examination, said witness admitted that neither six (6) packets of crystal, four (4) packets of opium, twenty two (22) packets of sheesha and four (4) packets of powder (heroin) were sealed separately nor did he mention the case number or name of the accused on the recovered packets---Said witness admitted that they did not make any entry in the Roznamcha regarding departure---Recovery witness in his examination-in-chief admitted that on the day of incident no other vehicle was checked, contradicting the complainant, who in his statement stated that during patrol duty, they made a blockade on main road and also checked cars---Moreso, neither in murasila nor in FIR there was any mention of blockade---In view of the contradictions highlighted, the prosecution version was found immensely cloudy---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English