PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ARSHAD IQBAL RANA vs SALMAN SAJJAD art — 2026 CLC 168 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2026 CLC 168 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
CLC
Parties
ARSHAD IQBAL RANA vs SALMAN SAJJAD art
Subject matter
Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ARSHAD IQBAL RANA VS SALMAN SAJJAD art.199(1)---Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, exercise of---Sine qua non---Satisfaction of the High Court that no other adequate remedy is provided by law---Scope---Expressions "adequate" and "satisfaction"---Connotations---The expressions "adequate" and "satisfaction" used in clause (1) of art. 199 of the Constitution are significant---Meaning of "adequate" is not provided in the Constitution, hence ordinary dictionary meaning is to be adopted as provided in Black's Law Dictionary (12th Edition) which is as follows:-adequate: (i) Fully satisfying requirements; sufficient, suitable, and acceptable in both quality and quantity; (ii) Legally sufficient; sufficing as a matter of law; (iii) Minimally satisfactory, barely reaching an acceptable standard; just good enough---With regard to the expression "satisfaction", for maintainability of a Constitutional petition, satisfaction of the High Court is sine qua non to the effect that no other adequate remedy is available to the litigant under the law.

Other judgments reported in 2026 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English