PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

UMAR FAROOQ vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB Ss — 2026 CLC 188 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2026 CLC 188 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
CLC
Parties
UMAR FAROOQ vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 42; S. 54---T; Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967); Property Act (V of 1882)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

UMAR FAROOQ VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB Ss. 8, 39, 42 & 54---Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), S.42(1)---Transfer of Property Act (V of 1882), S. 54---Transactions of mutations---Filing of a time barred suit for declaration, cancellation, possession and permanent injunction---Failure of real owner/predecessor-in-interest of claimants in his life time to challenge such mutations despite having knowledge thereof---Effect---Locus standi of successors to challenge such transactions/mutations---Scope---Where the real owner of the property who could have a cause of action to file the litigation or commence the proceedings or to challenge the act or document against his interest remained alive for number of years but despite having knowledge of the transactions never raised any claim quathe property or challenged the documents of sale in respect of property, or raised the objection which was being attempted to be raised by his successors, this is not permissible as the successors will have no locus standi to question the validity of those transactions---High Court affirmed the view taken by the trial court to the effect that the suit was barred by time, principle of acquiescence, waiver and estoppel and that the appellants had no locus standi or cause of action to file the suit.

Other judgments reported in 2026 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English