KHALID MEHMOOD vs MUHAMMAD ALI O — 2026 CLC 212 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

KHALID MEHMOOD VS MUHAMMAD ALI O.VI, R.17---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Plaintiff failing to mention in plaint exact date, time, place and witnesses of the transaction---Amendment in pleadings sought in order to fill such lacunas---Legality and permissibility---The petitioners/plaintiffs filed a Writ Petition challenging orders passed by the trial court and district court, respectively, whereby their application under O. VI R.17, C.P.C. for amendment of the plaint was partly allowed and their civil revision was dismissed---The petitioners had sought to substitute and expand paragraph No.1 of their plaint to introduce new facts, including specific dates, witnesses, and details of payments allegedly made over 44 years ago in connection with the purchase of the suit property---The trial and appellate courts held that while a minor clarification about sale receipts could be permitted, the proposed additions amounted to a material change in the factual foundation of the case after completion of trial and remand proceedings, rendering the same as an afterthought---Held: In the application for amendment, the petitioners sought to delete ??"?" of the plaint and to add amended ??"?" in its place, which prayer was allowed by the Trial Court---This amendment related to the receipts for the sale consideration---The Trial Court observed that these receipts were already mentioned in the original plaint and were part of the record---This part of proposed amendment was correctly deemed a clarification and necessary for the proper adjudication of the existing controversy---Regarding the second amendment sought by the petitioners/plaintiffs, a side by side comparison of the original plaint and the proposed insertions revealed that the proposed amendments were not just aclarification, but a complete overhaul of the factual matrix---It sought to introduce, for the very first time, the specific date of the alleged agreement, the names of three witnesses, the exact time and place of the transaction and a detailed breakdown of installment payments with specific dates and amounts---These were not minor details rather foundational facts that form the very basis of the cause of action---The courts below had exercised their jurisdiction judiciously and in accordance with the settled principles of law governing the amendment of pleadings---Petitioners failed to point out any illegality or jurisdictional error in the orders passed by the courts below, warranting interference of the High Court in the exercise of jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution---Petition being devoid of any merit, was dismissed in limine.

KHALID MEHMOOD vs MUHAMMAD ALI O — 2026 CLC 212 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2026 CLC