PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ASLIYAT KHAN vs Mst — 2026 CLC 424 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2026 CLC 424 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
CLC
Parties
ASLIYAT KHAN vs Mst
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 3---S; Limitation Act (IX of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ASLIYAT KHAN VS Mst. SAEEDA Ss. 42, 8 & 54---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S.3---Suit for declaration, permanent injunction and possession---Cancellation of inheritance mutation---Delay in challenging such mutation despite having knowledge---Effect---Limitation---Acquiescence of claimant---Estoppel---Scope---Claim of the petitioners was that his deceased brother died issueless and daughter (respondent No.2) was born out of the second marriage of wife (respondent No.1) of his deceased brother---Validity---Question of the parentage of respondent No.2 was never raised by the petitioners in the earlier suit instituted by respondent No.1 for recovery of dower against the petitioners etc., thus, petitioners by their conduct were estopped to question the parentage of respondent No.2---Not a single witness was produced by the petitioners to establish that respondent No.2 was born as a result of second marriage of respondent No.1---Evidence in the shape of school and NADRA record also revealed that the date of birth of respondent No.2 was recorded as 1997, whereas respondent No.1 contracted second marriage in the year 2005 and there was no rebuttal to that effect from petitioners' side---In the absence of any convincing and cogent evidence, the oral assertion of petitioners was not a valid and acceptable ground that respondent No.2 was not the daughter of the deceased brother of petitioners---Inheritance mutation was attested in 1999, whereas, suit was instituted by petitioners in 2016 i.e. after more than 17 years without giving any convincing justification, especially when respondent No.1 also claimed her dower through earlier suit in 2005---Not only the question of limitation was involved in the case, but petitioners through acquiescence had also weakened their stance while claiming the inheritance of their deceased brother---Petitioners failed to point out any flaw in the concurrent judgments of courts below---Revision petition was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2026 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English