PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD ZAIN-UL-ABIDEEN vs HAMID SAEED S — 2026 CLC 717 BOARD-OF-REVENUE-PUNJAB

Case information

Citation
2026 CLC 717 BOARD-OF-REVENUE-PUNJAB
Year
2026
Reporter
CLC
Parties
MUHAMMAD ZAIN-UL-ABIDEEN vs HAMID SAEED S
Provisions referred to
S. 8---R; S. 8; Revenue Act; Punjab Land Revenue Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD ZAIN-UL-ABIDEEN VS HAMID SAEED S. 8---Review---Scope---Scope of review under S.8 of the Punjab Board of Revenue Act, 1957, is narrow and exceptional, requiring a demonstrable error apparent on the face of the record, or a jurisdictional or legal misapprehension so fundamental as to vitiate the underlying order---In the present case, impugned order passed by the same Member - Board of Revenue departed from settled legal principles and disregarded material evidence and proceeded on a misconstruction of both law and fact; it failed to engage with the statutory limitations on revenue jurisdiction under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967, and overlooked the evidentiary value of registered documents duly produced on record---This Court, therefore, is not reappreciating evidence, but correcting a manifest legal error that strikes at the very root of judicial consistency and jurisdictional propriety---Thus, the review is not only maintainable, but imperative to uphold the integrity of adjudication within the bounds of lawful authority; it was compelled by the imperatives of justice, legality, and institutional discipline---Consequently, the impugned order passed by the Member-Board of Revenue, Punjab, was set aside---Review petition was allowed.

Other judgments reported in 2026 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English