FRANZEN LANBOUW C.V. through Deed of Assignment by Terrapoint B.V. vs TASCO through Administrator S — 2026 CLD 1 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2026 CLD 1 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2026
Reporter: CLD
Parties: FRANZEN LANBOUW C.V. through Deed of Assignment by Terrapoint B.V. vs TASCO through Administrator S
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 6---; S. 20---F

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

FRANZEN LANBOUW C.V. through Deed of Assignment by Terrapoint B.V. VS TASCO through Administrator S.6---arbitration act (X of 1940), S.20---Foreign arbitral award---Recognition and enforcement sought---Grounds for refusal---Ex-parte foreign arbitral award proceedings---Violation of fair trial, plea of---Impact on enforceability of award---Brief facts were that the applicant filed a miscellaneous application seeking recognition and enforcement of a Final Foreign arbitral award, rendered by the RUCIP arbitration Committee in the Netherlands, to be treated as a decree of the Court---Respondent opposed the recognition and enforcement of the foreign arbitral award and maintained that there was no privity of contract between the parties and the arbitral proceedings were conducted unilaterally and ex-parte in violation of the respondent's right to a fair trial---Held: Respondent failed to highlight any ground specifically which could merit refusal to enforce the award---It was apparent and admitted that the respondent categorically refused to participate in the proceedings, hence, his plea that the award was passed unilaterally was not sustainable---Further the question of privity of contract had already been addressed in paragraph number 4.2 of the award---The noted arguments ought to have been taken by the respondent in the arbitration proceedings---Refusal of the respondent to appear in the noted proceedings disentitled him to raise the said ground at the present stage---award was recognized as binding, hence, stood enforced by the High Court---The applicant was granted judgment in the amount mentioned in the award in question which was to be executed as a decree passed by the High Court---Present application stood converted into execution and was to be fixed for further proceedings---Present application was allowed, and award was enforced, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 CLD

2026 CLD 745 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANSALAAM TAKAFUL LIMITED VS DIRECTOR/HOD, ADJUDICATION DEPARTMENT-I, SECP, ISLAMABAD. Ss. 11(1)(b) & 29(2)(a)---Insurance company---Minimum st…
2026 CLD 704 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANFLOAT SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER (SMD). Reglns. 4(d), 16(9)(e) & 18( c ) (ii)---Maintaining independent audit function, fail…
2026 CLD 677 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANNEXT CAPITAL LIMITED VS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ADJUDICATION DEPARTMENT-I, SECP. Reglns. 6(3)(a), 6(3)(c), 6(4), 6(8), 4(a) & 13(7)---Requiremen…
2026 CLD 638 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANFIRST NATIONAL EQUITIES LIMITED VS DIRECTOR/HOD, ADJUDICATION-I. Reglns. 11, 13, 31 & annex. 1---anti-Money Laundering act (VII of 2010), Ss…
2026 CLD 528 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANCEDAR CAPITAL (PRIVATE) LIMITED (CCPL) VS COMMISSIONER, SMD, SECP. Ss. 15a & 15B---Right issue---Scope---Underwriting---Scope---Trading / pu…
2026 CLD 505 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANKASHF FOUNDATION VS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ADJUDICATION. Reglns. 6(5)(a), 6(3)(a), 6(4), 6(8) & 13(7)---Anti-Money laundering regulatory require…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English