PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

State vs Azmat Ali Bogar S — 2026 MLD 370 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court

Case information

Citation
2026 MLD 370 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
Year
2026
Reporter
MLD
Parties
State vs Azmat Ali Bogar S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 497; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

State VS Azmat Ali Bogar S. 497(5)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 500, 504, 505, 123-A, 341, 147 & 148---Defamation, public mischief, intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace, condemnation of creation of State and advocacy of abolition of its sovereignty, wrongful restrain, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly---Application for cancellation of bail, dismissal of---Petitioner/complainant was aggrieved of grant of post-arrest bail to respondents/accused by Sessions Court---Accused were charged for blocking the road and raising slogans against Pak Army and the State of Pakistan---Bail granted to a person by a competent Court of jurisdiction normally could be cancelled by considering the following grounds; bail was granted by a Court having no jurisdiction to grant it; accused/respondent had misused the concession of bail and was causing fear and alarm to the complainant and prosecution witnesses; accused on bail hampered the investigation; there was likelihood of witnesses being won over; accused was likely to abscond after grant of bail; bail granting order was arbitrary, capricious and against the evidence available with the prosecution---In the instant case the prosecution/State had failed to agitate any single ground for cancellation of bail in bail cancellation application/petition as well as in the arguments advanced by the prosecutor---Thus, these petitions were prima facie not maintainable---Moreover, FIR had been lodged on 10-5-2023 but despite lapse of more than two years of the lodging of the FIR, the prosecution had not submitted challan/final report in the Court of competent jurisdiction, hence, false implication of the accused/respondents could not be ruled out---Petitions for the cancellation of bail being devoid of merit were dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English