Usman Ali vs State S — 2026 MLD 551 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Usman Ali VS State S. 497---Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Ss. 2(37)(g), (h) & (k), 37-A, 37-B & 50-A---Tax fraud---Bail, grant of---Further inquiry---Allegations against accused were that, he uploaded fake returns and invoices regarding sales tax and the tax sought to be evaded by such fraud was estimated at R.36 million---In this case, the tax fraud alleged in the FIR was not committed by persons registered under the Sales Tax Act or who were part of the supply chain, rather it was alleged to commit by persons who were not registered under the Sales Tax Act but were involved in theft of sales tax profiles for creating fake and flying sales tax invoices for onward sale to registered persons---Therefore, the allegation against the applicant was that he was provided a PSID (Payment Slip ID generated by FBR's WeBOC System) for Rs. 100/, which was the challan for submitting revised sales tax returns and on 30-09-2024 the applicant paid the same using his Easypaisa account---It was not alleged that applicant was one who misappropriated the computer ID and password of the steel mill, or the one who generated the PSID, nor was it alleged that he uploaded the fake sales tax invoices/returns onto the system---After investigation, the co-accused was also released from custody and it was then also acknowledged in the interim challan that the person who had sent the PSID to the applicant was still under investigation---Therefore, it had yet to be ascertained whether payment made by the applicant was with knowledge that it was intended for committing sales tax fraud---In such circumstances, it was difficult to say that offences then punishable under clauses 11 and 22 of S.33 of the Sales Tax Act would be attracted to applicant---As regards the offence punishable under clause 13(b) of S.33 of the Sales Tax Act viz. abetment in tax fraud, even if that was made out, the tax implication was less than one billion rupees---Maximum imprisonment provided for that was five years which did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C.---Thus, bail became the rule and its refusal, an exception---Bail application was allowed, in circumstances. Citation Name: 2026 MLD 551 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Usman Ali VS State S. 497---Bail order---Observations of the Court---Scope---Observations made in bail order are tentative and should not be construed to prejudice the case of either side at trial.

Usman Ali vs State S — 2026 MLD 551 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2026 MLD