PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Hair Biyar Khan vs State S — 2026 MLD 633 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2026 MLD 633 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Hair Biyar Khan vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 497---C; S. 9; S. 497; S. 497---B; Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Hair Biyar Khan VS State S. 497---Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997) [as amended by Control of Narcotic Substances (Amendment) Act (XX of 2022)], S. 9(1), Sr. No. 3(c)---Possession of chars---Bail, grant/dismissal of---Allegation against the accused-applicant was that 2000-grams chars was recovered from beneath the driver seat of the jeep being driven by the applicant---Perusal of record revealed that the accused was driving the vehicle, while the co-accused was found sitting on the front seat---Inchargeof the vehicle was always considered to be the driver of the vehicle and he was held responsible for recovery of any sort of article from the said vehicle---Driver of the vehicle could not be absolved from the liability, if substances were transported in the vehicle being driven by him---On tentative assessment of the record, prima facie it appeared that the accused applicant was found seated on the driving seat of the vehicle and recovery of 2000-grams chars was also effected from beneath the driving seat---Offence fell within the ambit of prohibitory clause of S.497(1),Cr.P.C., which was not only heinous, but also non-bailable---Therefore, Court was not inclined to grant bail to accused applicant and to his extent the bail application was dismissed---Record transpired that the co-accused was seated on the front seat of vehicle and nothing had been recovered from his exclusive possession rather the contraband was recovered from beneath the driving seat---Under such circumstances, the case of the said co-accused fell within the ambit of further inquiry, thus the innocence or guilt of said co-accused was yet to be determined, which could only be determined after recording evidence---Bail application to the extent of said co-accused was allowed, in circumstances. Citation Name: 2026 MLD 633 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Hair Biyar Khan VS State S. 497---Bail order---Observations of the Court---Scope---Observations made in the bail order are tentative in nature, and same shall not influence the merits of the case at the trial.

Other judgments reported in 2026 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English