PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Syed Hammad Naqvi vs State Ss — 2026 PCrLJ 459 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2026 PCrLJ 459 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Syed Hammad Naqvi vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Syed Hammad Naqvi VS State Ss. 302(b), 376, 380, 411 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, rape, theft in adwelling house, tent, or vessel, dishonestly receiving stolen property, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Presence of Court witness at the venue doubtful---Chance witness, evidence of---Scope---Accused were charged for committing rape and murder of the minor daughter of the complainant---Court witness appeared before the Court as achance witness who, according to prosecution's version, happened to be present at the complainant's house at about 12:30 p.m. on the day of the alleged incident---Said witness claimed to observe one door of the house to be locked and the other slightly opened---Said witness allegedly saw appellants leaving the house through the back side of the courtyard---However, said witness in his statement contradicted the prosecution's version entirely---Court witness clearly denied any knowledge of the incident and stated that he had no connection whatsoever with the case---Such sharp contradiction between what the prosecution claimed, what court witness witnessed and what he said under oath significantly undermined the reliability of the prosecution's story---Fact that akey witness disowned the very events he was purported to have witnessed, created serious doubt about the truthfulness of the prosecution's version---Such a material discrepancy damaged the case's credibility, reflecting either a false implication or manipulation of facts---Therefore, testimony of Court Witness, instead of supporting the prosecution, raised major concerns about the authenticity of their narrative and rendered their case highly doubtful---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English