PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Sakina Bibi vs State S — 2026 PCrLJ 505 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2026 PCrLJ 505 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Sakina Bibi vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 9

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Sakina Bibi VS State S.9(1), Sr.Nos.(3)(c) & (e)---Possession of narcotic substances---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Road certificate not procedure---Prosecution case was that 2824-grams chars in three packets and 6154-grams opium in seven packets were recovered from the possession of accused-appellant---Neither the Investigating Officer nor Moharrer of the police station or the complainant uttered a single word about road certificate issued by the Investigating Officer from the DPO office at the time of transmission of sample parcels to office of Forensic Science Agency---Non-mentioning of any road certificate in statements as well as non-production of any such road certificate has made the prosecution case further dubious and doubtful---Complaint had been abruptly concluded without mentioning the venue of its preparation, the time of its conclusion and no fact about the sending of the said complaint to the police station through Police Constable was mentioned---Non-mentioning of said particulars at the bottom of complaint further made the whole prosecution case dubious so far as any recovery of narcotics from the possession of the present appellant at a chowk was concerned---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English