PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Mehboob Ali Mallah vs State S — 2026 PCrLJ 733 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2026 PCrLJ 733 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Mehboob Ali Mallah vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 302

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Mehboob Ali Mallah VS State S. 302(b)---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 129(g)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Withholding material witness---Adverse presumption---Accused was charged for committing murder of his wife/daughter of complainant by firing---Most importantly, the prosecution did not examine "AB" as a witness, despite his evidently pivotal role as the first informer and a participant in the medical identification process---Failure to produce such a vital witness, who could have substantiated key aspects of the case, amounted to withholding material evidence---Said omission invited an adverse inference against the prosecution under Art.129(g) of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, which empowered the Court to draw unfavorable conclusions where a party suppressed or withheld evidence within its control---Moreover, while the prosecution moved an application to summon the Tapedar, it conspicuously failed to seek permission to produce "AB", the most significant marginal witness in this case---Said selective approach further highlighted the weakness in the prosecution's evidence and raised doubts about the completeness of the case presented against the appellant---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English