PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Arif vs State Ss — 2026 PCrLJ 875 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2026 PCrLJ 875 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Muhammad Arif vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Arif VS State Ss. 302(b), 376 & 338-C---Qatl-i-amd, rape, isqat-i-janin---Appreciation of evidence---Last seen evidence doubtful---Accused was charged for committing murder of the niece of complainant by cutting her throat with sharp-edged weapon---As far as evidence of last seen was concerned, the same came out from the mouth of two witnesses, who were close relatives of deceased---Testimonies of both the said witnesses came up with material contradictions and inconsistencies which made the evidence of last seen highly doubtful---According to the testimony of Investigating Officer, both the witnesses of last seen had failed to point out the place where they met with the appellant and deceased---As per the contents of FIR, the occurrence took place on 30-06-2019 at Asar prayer time and according to the testimony of complainant, police took dead body of deceased to RHC, at about 12:00 p.m. and the dead body of deceased was handed over to him after 02:00 p.m.---Funeral prayer of deceased was conducted after Asar prayer---Witnesses of last seen also reached at RHC, where they disclosed the fact regarding the evidence of last seen of appellant with deceased and then submitted application to police---In such circumstances, if said witnesses informed the evidence of last seen evidence to the complainant before lodging of the FIR then their names should have been mentioned in the FIR---Such self-negating and contradictory statements of the said witnesses reflected that they were not truthful witnesses, rather they were deposing an afterthought, fabricated and concocted story just to create incriminating evidence to strengthen the case of un-witnessed occurrence against the appellant---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English