DIRECTOR GENERAL EDUCATION MONITORING AUTHORITY, PESHAWAR vs Mst — 2026 PLD 111 FEDERAL-CONSTITUTIONAL-COURT |

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

DIRECTOR GENERAL EDUCATION MONITORING AUTHORITY, PESHAWAR VS Mst. LUBNA Rr. 3(i), Table, Serial No.(ii) & (iii) & 4, proviso---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 175F(1)(c)---Initial appointment---Upper age limit---Relaxation---Backward area---Petitioner / authority was aggrieved of judgment passed by High Court declaring respondent / candidate as entitled to relaxation of upper age limit for her appointment to post in question---Validity---Only hurdle/objection in appointment of respondent / candidate was that she was over age---Respondent / candidate hailed from District Buner, and as per Serial No.xiv of Appendix to Rule 3(ii) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Initial Appointment to Civil Posts (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 2008, the area was in the category of "backward areas"---Besides three years automatic relaxation under category (ii) specified in Rule 3(i) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Initial Appointment to Civil Posts (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 2008, respondent / candidate was also entitled to relaxation in upper age limit upto two years by appointing authority under Serial No.iii of Table of Rule 3(i) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Initial Appointment to Civil Posts (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 2008---Case of respondent / candidate was also covered under the category of "general candidates", as stipulated in proviso to Rule 4 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Initial Appointment to Civil Posts (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 2008---Federal Constitutional Court declined to interfere in judgment passed by High Court as there was no illegality, irregularity or infirmity and respondent / candidate was entitled to relaxation in upper age limit---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed and leave to appeal was refused.

DIRECTOR GENERAL EDUCATION MONITORING AUTHORITY, PESHAWAR vs Mst — 2026 PLD 111 FEDERAL-CONSTITUTIONAL-COURT

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2026 PLD