PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ABRAR HUSSAIN vs Mst — 2026 PLD 42 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2026 PLD 42 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2026
Reporter
PLD
Parties
ABRAR HUSSAIN vs Mst
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 42---I

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ABRAR HUSSAIN VS Mst. BIBI SHAHIDA. S. 42---Inheritance---Dispute regarding right of inheritance in the property left by predecessor-in-interest who passed away two decades ago---Daughter of the deceased claiming her share of inheritance---Male heir claiming property was gifted to him by their late father---Burden to prove---The case arises from a family inheritance dispute concerning immovable property owned by the parties' deceased father, who passed away in 2002 leaving behind several heirs, including the petitioner and respondent No. 1---In 2015, respondent No. 1 instituted a suit for declaration, partition, recovery of mesne profits, and injunction regarding the said property---The trial court decreed the suit, holding all heirs entitled to their respective shares, and the first appellate court and the High Court upheld this decision by dismissing the petitioner's appeals---The petitioner thereafter filed the present civil petition before the Supreme Court challenging the High Court's judgment---Held: Petitioner (defendant No. 6) neither produced the attesting witnesses nor adduced trustworthy and confidence-inspiring evidence to establish the document in his favor as genuine---The Trial Court, as such, rightly noted that the Iqrar Nama relied upon by the petitioner lacked the particulars of witnesses such as their addresses and CNIC numbers, rendering it "dubious and unreliable"---Similarly, the purported certificate of possession remained unproven---It was undisputed that the predecessor-in-interest continued to exercise possessory rights over the property during his lifetime and that utility connections remained in his name---The concurrent findings of the courts below required no interference nor did any question of law arise for consideration by the Supreme Court---Leave to appeal was refused and the petition was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2026 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English