PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SANGU TRAVELS TRANSPORT (PRIVATE) LTD. vs SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE/APPELLATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR MUZAFFARABAD art — 2026 PLD 5 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Case information

Citation
2026 PLD 5 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Year
2026
Reporter
PLD
Parties
SANGU TRAVELS TRANSPORT (PRIVATE) LTD. vs SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE/APPELLATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR MUZAFFARABAD art
Subject matter
Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SANGU TRAVELS TRANSPORT (PRIVATE) LTD. VS SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE/APPELLATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR MUZAFFARABAD art. 44---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Doctrine of 'equality' taking breath from horizon of fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution carries multiple dimensions---If authority at the helm of affairs turns a blind eye qua dispensation of administrative justice, High Court as a Custodian of the Constitution can execute and enforce the command of the Constitution---Myraid injustices and deviation of fundamental right remained unattended by the appellate authority in the present case, but when High Court comes across any violation of the command of the Constitution, High Court cannot shut its eyes, as writ is answer of such incorrigible injustices----Power of the writ Court is extremely wide and the hands of the writ court can reach everywhere---High Court while exercising powers conferred under art. 44 of the aJ&K Interim Constitution, 1974 is a writ Court, and in that connection, if true desiderata flowing from constitutionally guaranteed fundamental right is asked for by an aggrieved person in search of solace, High Court cannot sit on the fence by allowing the violation of guarantees of certain rights listed in art. 4 of the Constitution---although, equality among equals is command of the Constitution, but for all its practical purposes it is yet a taboo in our society, class and clan discrimination/favouritism is still holding the field and a common phenomenon.

Other judgments reported in 2026 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English