PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LAHORE vs COCA COLA EXPORT CORPORATION Fiscal statutes — 2026 PTD 318 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2026 PTD 318 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
PTD
Parties
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LAHORE vs COCA COLA EXPORT CORPORATION Fiscal statutes

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LAHORE VS COCA COLA EXPORT CORPORATION Fiscal statutes---Two possible interpretations---Doubt about true import of provision---Benefit of doubt to taxpayer---Principle--- Where a fiscal provision is capable of two possible interpretations and there exists doubt regarding its true meaning, interpretation favourable to taxpayer must be adopted. It is a settled principle of interpretation of fiscal statutes that language of tax laws cannot be stretched in favour of State nor narrowed against taxpayer. Benefit of doubt in interpretation of charging or fiscal provision goes in favour of taxpayer.

Other judgments reported in 2026 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English