PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

DIRECTOR INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION (CUSTOMS), FBR, PESHAWAR vs MUHAMMAD AFZAL Ss — 2026 PTD 813 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2026 PTD 813 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
PTD
Parties
DIRECTOR INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION (CUSTOMS), FBR, PESHAWAR vs MUHAMMAD AFZAL Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

DIRECTOR INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION (CUSTOMS), FBR, PESHAWAR VS MUHAMMAD AFZAL Ss.2(s), 16, 157(2) & 168(1)---Smuggling, allegation of---Vehicle, confiscation of---Legal documents, production of---Release of vehicle---Documentary proof of lawful purchase---Non-consideration of material evidence by adjudicating authority---Effect---Department filed Reference against order of Customs Appellate Tribunal whereby release of goods and vehicle was directed---Whether, where the owner produced auction documents and bank receipts proving lawful purchase, the confiscation of goods and vehicle could be sustained?---Held:---Record showed that the respondent, being the real owner of the goods, submitted an application before the concerned Additional Collector (I & I), Customs, Peshawar, stating that he had purchased the seized skimmed milk in auction proceedings held at Custom House, Quetta, for which he paid Rs. 38,61,000/- and had also purchased 390 sacks of onions for Rs. 433,400/----He was transporting both goods to Lahore when the applicant-authority seized and later confiscated them---The respondent had submitted auction documents and bank receipts in support of his claim---The Additional Collector, in his Order-in-Original, failed to consider the said application and supporting documents; instead, he relied upon a written application allegedly expressing willingness of the respondent to pay leviable duties and taxes on the seized goods---The Customs Tribunal rightly considered this material aspect of the case and accepted the version of the respondent through a well-reasoned order---Non-consideration of material evidence vitiates adjudication---Therefore, the proposed question was answered in the affirmative, i.e. in favour of the respondent (owner of vehicle)---Special Customs Reference filed by the Department was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2026 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English