SINDH IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE AUTHORITY vs PROVINCE OF SINDH — 2026 SCMR 190 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation: 2026 SCMR 190 SUPREME-COURT
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year: 2026
Reporter: SCMR
Parties: SINDH IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE AUTHORITY vs PROVINCE OF SINDH
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 5---L; Limitation Act (IX of 1908); Limitation Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SINDH IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE AUTHORITY VS PROVINCE OF SINDH. S.5---Limitation Act (IX of 1908)---Condonation of delay---Factors to be considered---Sufficient cause---Scope. The expression "sufficient cause" is always dependent upon bona fide explanation. The purpose of limitation prescribed under Limitation Act, 1908 is not meant to destroy rights of parties but to ensure that parties do not resort to delay or negligent conduct and that legal remedies remain available within the period prescribed by legislature. While considering application for condonation of delay, no straightjacket formula can be applied. Each case must be examined on its own facts and circumstances. Conduct of parties regarding delay, procrastination and negligence is relevant while considering balance of justice. Careless, intentional or unexplained delay and absence of bona fide cannot constitute sufficient cause. Law of limitation is founded on public policy and seeks finality of litigation.

Other judgments reported in 2026 SCMR

2026 SCMR 1063 SUPREME-COURTMUHAMMAD IMRAN VS ISHFAQ AHMED. Ss. 12 & 39---Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Agreement already cancelled by Court of c…
2026 SCMR 1056 SUPREME-COURTSALAMAT ALI VS State. S. 365-A---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Ss. 6 & 7(e)---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 129(g)---Kidnapping…
2026 SCMR 36 SUPREME-COURTMUHAMMAD ASHRAF ANJUM VS SABIR HUSSAIN Ss. 12 & 22---Contract Act (IX of 1872), S. 55---Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell--…
2026 SCMR 1045 SUPREME-COURTPROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Punjab Emergency Service Department, Lahore VS MUHAMMAD KHALIL. Art.260---Service of Pakistan---Meaning…
2026 SCMR 1045 SUPREME-COURTPROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Punjab Emergency Service Department, Lahore VS MUHAMMAD KHALIL. S.4(2) [as amended by Punjab Emergency…
2026 SCMR 966 SUPREME-COURTGHULAM ALI VS ALI SHER. Art.185(3)---Appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court---Concurrent findings---Interference. Concurrent findings canno…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English