PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ASIM GULFRAZ vs State — 2026 SCMR 398 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2026 SCMR 398 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2026
Reporter
SCMR
Parties
ASIM GULFRAZ vs State
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
Pakistan Penal Code

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ASIM GULFRAZ VS State. Section 377-B, Pakistan Penal Code, 1860---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 19---Sexual abuse---Reappraisal of evidence---Doctrine of res gestae---Applicability---Scope. Accused was charged for sexually abusing minor son of complainant. Complainant/mother of victim, in her statement before the Court, also charged petitioner-convict for commission of offence. Complainant deposed that immediately after occurrence, her minor son narrated the entire incident to her. Complainant faithfully reproduced before the Court the facts disclosed to her by victim son at the first available opportunity and thereafter reported the matter to police. Statement of complainant, being contemporaneous with occurrence and forming part of the same transaction, fell within the ambit of doctrine of res gestae. Such statement was admissible in evidence under Article 19 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984. Doctrine of res gestae permits admission of facts which are so connected with the fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction, particularly where such facts are narrated immediately after occurrence and carry inherent spontaneity and reliability. The statement of complainant was therefore rightly considered as corroborative evidence supporting the account of minor victim. Petition being devoid of merit was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2026 SCMR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English