PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SAID-UR-REHMAN vs State — 2026 SCMR 955 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2026 SCMR 955 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2026
Reporter
SCMR
Parties
SAID-UR-REHMAN vs State
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SAID-UR-REHMAN VS State. Ss.302(b), 201 & 34---Cr.P.C. Ss.164 & 364---Confessional statement. Reappraisal of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Discrepancies in recording judicial confession. Accused were arrested on 17.02.2016 during purported inquiry before registration of FIR. Judicial confessions were recorded on 23.02.2016 after six days of illegal arrest. Statements of Magistrate and Investigating Officer regarding custody of accused after recording confession were contradictory. Such inconsistency created doubt regarding voluntariness and reliability of alleged confessions. Prosecution failed to prove case beyond reasonable doubt. Appeal against conviction was allowed.

Other judgments reported in 2026 SCMR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English