PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Ali Haider vs State Ss — 2026 YLR 102 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2026 YLR 102 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Ali Haider vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 161

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Ali Haider VS State Ss. 302(b), 201 & 34---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 129(g)---Qatl-i-amd, causing disappearance of evidence of offence or giving false information to screen offender, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Withholding material witness---Adverse presumption---Accused were charged for committing murder of the daughter of complainant---Complainant and his wife appeared to be interested witnesses as they concealed the presence of wife of appellant and wife of his brother---Police records indicated that the statements of said witnesses under S.161, Cr.P.C., recorded on 13.10.2021, confirmed their presence at the house during the incident---Said witnesses stated that they heard commotion, found deceased lying beside a cot and witnessed appellant taking her for treatment, but she had already passed away---Said witnesses also informed husband of deceased of her death via phone---To establish an unbroken chain of events, the prosecution was obligated to examine said two ladies, who had firsthand knowledge of the circumstances surrounding death of deceased---Prosecutor's opinion dated 15.10.2021, referenced in the police file, also noted that said two witnesses had initially withheld crucial information and attempted to shield the offenders---Prosecutor recommended placing the names of said witnesses in Column No. 02 of the charge sheet---However, the record revealed that this recommendation was implemented, nor were they produced before the Trial Court to testify---Such an omission warranted an adverse inference under Art.129(g) of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984---Moreover, wife of complainant, during her testimony, denied seeing her other daughter, at the scene, whereas other female witness testified that her daughter was indeed present---Such contradiction further reinforced the prosecution's failure to produce the best available evidence---Under Art.129(g) of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, when a party withheld crucial evidence, it was presumed that such evidence would have been unfavorable to its case---Additionally, although the prosecution recorded statement of husband of deceased under S.161, Cr.P.C., on 19.05.2021, but he was not produced before the Trial Court for testimony---Said deliberate withholding of evidence further strengthened the presumption that the prosecution intentionally avoided presenting witnesses whose statements could undermine its case---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English