PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Arshad vs State Ss — 2026 YLR 513 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2026 YLR 513 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Muhammad Arshad vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 161

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Arshad VS State Ss.302(b) & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Presence of eye-witnesses at spot not proved--- Accused was charged that he along with co-accused committed murder of son of complainant by firing--- Complainant stated during cross-examination that occurrence did not take place at prayer time and he failed to provide plausible explanation for his presence at spot--- Complainant admitted that residence of eye-witness was situated at considerable distance from place of occurrence--- Eye-witness also admitted that his residence was situated at a distance of half kilometer from place of occurrence and he had not mentioned any reason for his presence in his statement under S.161 Cr.P.C. Absence of both eye-witnesses from spot was further established from inquest report where deceased was identified by given-up witness and another witness--- Non-identification of dead body by alleged eye-witnesses created serious doubt because if they had been present at occurrence or accompanied deceased to hospital, they would have identified him--- All circumstances cumulatively showed that occurrence was unseen and prosecution attempted to involve accused through planted eye-witnesses--- Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English