PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

AHMAD BILAL vs STATE S — 2026 YLR 901 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2026 YLR 901 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
YLR
Parties
AHMAD BILAL vs STATE S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 302

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

AHMAD BILAL VS STATE S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Medical evidence contradicting the ocular account---Accused was charged for committing murder of the son of complainant by firing---Defence alleged that in the crime report, the complainant alleged that the appellant made successive fire shots upon the deceased but the Medical Officer observed only two entry wounds, as such medical evidence lent no support to the ocular account---Term "successive fire shots" ruled out the possibility of single fire shot and clearly suggested more than one---Thus, it might reasonably be understood to mean two fire shots---In fact, the complainant used a phrasal expression rather than a precise, figurative description, therefore, on that account it could not be said that medical evidence contradicted ocular account---Post mortem examination was held within ten minutes of lodging of the crime report---Locale, nature and duration of injuries and weapon of offence used for causing those injuries was exactly in line with the ocular account and as such the medical evidence lent full support to the ocular account---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English